Odnośniki
- Index
- Jack Higgins PC 01 The Bormann Testament (com v4.0)
- Tim Green Kingdom Come (com v4.0)
- Coulter Catherine FBI Godzina smierci
- 057. Maciej Popko Huryci (1992)
- dav
- Cook Robin (1995) Zaraza
- Green, Simon R Haven 01 Hawk and Fisher
- Courths Mahler Jadwiga Pomóśźcie Monice (Mona)
- Dać‡ radć™ w Polsce informator dla cudzoziemców 2009r
- Howard, Robert E Almuric
- zanotowane.pl
- doc.pisz.pl
- pdf.pisz.pl
- kfr.xlx.pl
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
can give it a complex structure as follows: let À : C ’! C/Z be the quotient map; for any
P " C/Z and Q " f-1(P ) we can find open neighbourhoods U of P and V of Q such that
À : U ’! V is a homeomorphism; take any such pair (U, À-1 : U ’! V ) to be a coordinate
function.
For any open U ‚" C/Z, a function f : U ’! C is holomorphic for this complex structure
if and only if f æ% À is holomorphic. Thus the holomorphic functions f on U ‚" C/Z can
be identified with the holomorphic functions g on À-1(U) invariant under Z, i.e., such that
g(z + 1) = g(z).
For example, q(z) = e2Àiz defines a holomorphic function on C/Z. In fact, it gives an
isomorphism C/Z ’! C× whose in inverse C× ’! C/Z is (by definition) (2Ài)-1 · log.
114 J.S. MILNE
Example 23.5. Let D be the open unit disk {z | |z|
on D. The Schwarz lemma implies that Aut(D) = {z " C | |z| = 1} H" R/Z, and it follows
that " is a finite cyclic group. Let z ’! ¶z be its generator and suppose that ¶ has order m,
i.e., ¶m = 1. Then zm is invariant under ", and so defines a function on "\D, which in fact
is a homeomorphism "\D ’! D, and therefore defines a complex structure on "\D.
Let À : D ’! "\D be the quotient map. Then f ’! f æ%À identifies the space of holomorphic
functions on U ‚" "\D with the space of holomorphic functions on À-1(U) such that f(¶z) =
f(z), i.e., which are of the form f(z) = h(zm) with h holomorphic. Note that if À(Q) = P ,
1
then ordP (f) = ordQ(f æ% À).
m
Let “ be a group acting on a Riemann surface X. A fundamental domain for “ is a
connected open subset D of X such that
(a) no two points of D lie in the same orbit of “;
¯
(b) the closure D of D contains at least one element from each orbit.
For example,
D = {z " C | 0
is a fundamental domain for Z acting on C (as in 23.4), and
D0 = {z " D | 0
is a fundamental domain for Z/nZ acting on the unit disk (as in 23.5).
The Riemann surfaces X(“). Let “ be a subgroup of finite index in SL2(Z). We want
to define the structure of a Riemann surface on the quotient “\H. This we can do, but the
resulting surface will not be compact. Instead, we need to form a quotient “\H" where H"
properly contains H.
The action of SL2(Z) on the upper half plane. Recall that SL2(Z) acts on H = {z | (z) > 0}
according to
az + b
a b
z = .
c d
cz + d
-1 0
Note that -I = acts trivially on H, and so the action factors through
0 -1
PSL2(Z) = SL2(Z)/{±I}.
Let
-1
0 -1
S = , so Sz = ,
1 0
z
and
1 1
T = , so T z = z + 1.
0 1
Then
S2 = 1, (ST )3 = 1 in PSL2(Z).
Proposition 23.6. Let
1 1
D = z " H | |z| > 1, -
2 2
ELLIPTIC CURVES 115
¯
(a) D is a fundamental domain for SL2(Z); moreover, two elements z and z of D are in
the same orbit if and only if
(i) (z) = ±1 and z = z ± 1 (so z = T z or z = T z );
2
(ii) |z| = 1 and z = -1/z (= Sz).
¯
(b) For z " D, the stabilizer of z is = {±I} if and only if z = i, in which case the
stabilizer is , or Á = e2Ài/6, in which case the stabilizer is , or Á2, in which
case it is .
(c) The group PSL2(Z) is generated by S and T .
¯
Proof. Let “ =. One first shows that “ D = H, from which (a) and (b) follow
easily. For (c), let ³ " SL2(Z), and choose a point z0 in D. There exists a ³ in “ such that
³z0 = ³ z0, and it follows from (b) that ³ ³-1 = ±I. For the details, see (Serre, Course on
Arithmetic, VII.1.2).
Remark 23.7. Let “ be a subgroup of finite index in SL2(Z), and write
SL2(Z) = “³1 *" . . . *" “³m (disjoint union).
Then D = *"³iD satisfies the conditions to be a fundamental domain for “, except that it
won t be connected. However, it is possible to choose the ³i so that the closure of D is
connected, in which case the interior of the closure will be a fundamental domain. for “.
The extended upper half plane. The elements of SL2(Z) act on P1(C) by projective linear
transformations,
a b
(z1 : z2) = (az1 + bz2 : cz1 + dz2).
c d
Identify H, Q, and {"} with subsets of P1(C) according to
z ”! (z : 1) z " H
r ”! (r : 1) r " Q .
" ”! (1 : 0)
The action of SL2(Z) stabilizes H" =df H *" Q *" {"}. For example, for z " H,
az + b
a b
(z : 1) = (az + b : cz + d) = ( : 1)
c d
cz + d
as usual, and for r " Q,
a b (ar+b : 1) r = -d
cr+d c
(r : 1) = (ar + b : cr + d) = ,
c d
" r = -d
c
and, finally,
a b (a : 1) c = 0,
c
" = (a : c) = .
c d " c = 0
Thus in passing from H to H", we have added one additional SL2(Z) orbit. The points in
H" not in H are often called the cusps.
We make H" into a topological space as follows: the topology on H is that inherited from
C; the sets
{z | (z) > M}, M > 0
116 J.S. MILNE
form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of "; the sets
{z | |z - (a + ir)|
form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of a " Q. One shows that H" is Hausdorff,
and that the action of SL2(Z) is continuous.
The topology on “\H". Recall that if À : X ’! Y is a surjective map and X is a topological
space, then the quotient topology on Y is that for which a set U is open if and only of
À-1(U) is open. In general the quotient of a Hausdorff space by a group action will not be
Hausdorff, even if the orbits are closed one needs that distinct orbits have disjoint open
neighbourhoods.
Let “ be a subgroup of finite index in SL2(Z). One can show that such a “ acts properly
discontinuously on H, i.e., that for any pair of points x, y " H, there exist neighbourhoods
U of x and V of y such that
{³ " “ | ³U )" V = "}
is finite. In particular, this implies that the stabilizer of any point in H is finite (which we
knew anyway).
Proposition 23.8. (a) For any compact sets A and B of H, {³ " “ | ³A )" B = "} is
finite.
(b) Any z " H has a neighbourhood U such that
³U )" U = "
only if ³z = z.
(c) For any points x, y of H not in the same “-orbit, there exist neighbourhoods U of x
and V of y such that ³U )" V = " for all ³ " “
Proof. (a) This follows easily from the fact that “ acts properly discontinuously.
(b) Let V be compact neighbourhood of z. From (a) we know that there is only a finite
set {³1, . . . , ³n} of “ such that V )" ³iV = ". Let ³1, . . . , ³s be the ³i s fixing z, and for each
i > s, choose disjoint neighbourhoods Vi of z and Wi of ³iz, and set
-1
U = V )" ()"i>sVi )" ³i Wi).
For i > s, ³iU ‚" Wi, which is disjoint from Vi, which contains U.
(c) Choose compact neighbourhoods A of x and B of y, and let ³1, . . . , ³n be the elements
of “ such that ³iA )" B = ". We know ³ix = y, and so we can find disjoint neighbourhoods
Ui and Vi of ³ix and y. Take
-1 -1
U = A )" ³1 U1 )" . . . )" ³n Un, V = B )" V1 )" . . . )" Vn.
Corollary 23.9. The space “\H is Hausdorff.
Proof. Let x and y be points of H not in the same “-orbit, and choose neighbourhoods U and
V of x and y as in (c) of the last proposition. Then “U and “V are disjoint neighbourhoods
of “x and “y.
In fact, “\H" will be Hausdorff, and compact.
ELLIPTIC CURVES 117
The complex structure on “0(N)\H". The subgroups of SL2(Z) that we shall be espe-
cially interested in are
a b
“0(N) = c a" 0 mod N .
c d
We let “0(1) = SL2(Z).
For z0 " H, choose a neighbourhood V of z0 such that
³V )" V = " =Ò! ³z0 = z0,
and let U = À(V ) it is open because À-1U = *"³V is open.
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]